My comments in this space last issue about on-again, off-again funding for the Conservation Security Program (CSP) hit some hot buttons. If you've been following the Washington scene, you know that the administration and Congress are holding up or diverting funds slated for farmers initiating conservation methods on private land.

In an e-mail message, Lynn in North Dakota said, “I think it would be counterproductive…to pull funding for this program. This is just another case of the administration talking the talk but unwilling to walk the walk when it comes to commonsense ag programs. The beauty of CSP is that it uses a carrot, rather than a stick, to promote good agriculture. It benefits both producers and environmentalists.”

Todd (no address given) wrote, “I've got all my ducks in a row and I'm ready to apply for CSP funds as soon as sign-up begins. We've taken 30 acres out of production already for double-wide waterways and filter strips. I want to convert to strip-till, but equipment costs are prohibitive. The CSP is important to me directly, but I also hoped it would be an incentive for neighbors uphill from me to reduce tillage.”

Closer to where you live, the diverted funds will affect the recent agreement between USDA and the American Society of Agronomy to allow local Certified Crop Advisers to work as technical service providers on NRCS conservation projects (see page 13).

Given all that's happening, the give and take on farm bill funding is perhaps not surprising. But it is disappointing. Let us know what you think. Send an e-message to roross@primediabusiness.com.

Want to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2007 Penton Media, Inc.